| Tier | 14d Volume | Maker | Taker |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0base | — | 0.0150% | 0.0450% |
| 1 | $5.0M | 0.0120% | 0.0400% |
| 2 | $25M | 0.0080% | 0.0350% |
| 3 | $100M | 0.0040% | 0.0300% |
| 4 | $500M | 0.0000% | 0.0280% |
| 5 | $2.0B | 0.0000% | 0.0260% |
| 6 | $7.0B | 0.0000% | 0.0240% |
| Tier | 14d Volume | Maker | Taker |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0base | — | 0.0400% | 0.0700% |
| 1 | $5.0M | 0.0300% | 0.0600% |
| 2 | $25M | 0.0200% | 0.0500% |
| 3 | $100M | 0.0100% | 0.0400% |
| 4 | $500M | 0.0000% | 0.0350% |
| 5 | $2.0B | 0.0000% | 0.0300% |
| 6 | $7.0B | 0.0000% | 0.0250% |
| Wood | > 10 HYPE | 5% |
| Bronze | > 100 | 10% |
| Silver | > 1,000 | 15% |
| Gold | > 10,000 | 20% |
| Platinum | > 100,000 | 30% |
| Diamond | > 500,000 | 40% |
Hyperliquid trading fees depend on your fee tier and whether an order is executed as maker or taker. The tables above show the current Hyperliquid fee structure, including the maker and taker rates available across different Hyperliquid fee tiers.
For perpetual trading, Hyperliquid futures fees are determined by the applicable tier and order type. Hyperliquid taker fees apply when an order removes liquidity, while maker orders can use a different rate and may qualify for a Hyperliquid maker rebate under applicable conditions. Your effective Hyperliquid fee therefore depends on both trading volume and maker/taker mix.
The fee schedule above can also be used to compare Hyperliquid fees vs Binance and other venues. The cheapest option depends on your trading activity, tier and order mix rather than the headline taker rate alone.
Hyperliquid fees are the trading charges applied when orders are executed on the platform. The applicable rate depends on your fee tier and whether the trade is executed as maker or taker.
Hyperliquid trading fees are the maker and taker charges associated with executed trades. Your effective trading cost can change as your applicable fee tier changes.
Hyperliquid maker taker fees distinguish between orders that add liquidity and orders that remove it. A Hyperliquid maker fee applies to qualifying maker orders, while a Hyperliquid taker fee applies when an order takes existing liquidity from the book.
Hyperliquid fee tiers determine the maker and taker rates available to a trader. The applicable tier can change with qualifying trading activity, so higher-volume traders may face different rates from the base schedule.
The Hyperliquid fee structure combines fee tiers with separate maker and taker rates. The table above shows the applicable Hyperliquid fee schedule so the cost of different order types can be compared directly.
Hyperliquid futures fees refer to the trading costs associated with its perpetual derivatives markets. The effective cost depends on the applicable fee tier and whether the order is executed as maker or taker.
Hyperliquid fees vs Binance depend on your fee tier, trading volume and maker/taker mix. A venue with a lower headline taker fee is not necessarily cheaper for every trader, so the relevant rates should be compared using the same trading assumptions.
There is no single answer for every trader. When comparing Hyperliquid vs Binance fees, consider both maker and taker rates, applicable tiers and any rebates or discounts. The fee tables above let you compare the published rates directly.